Post by account_disabled on Jan 10, 2024 0:48:02 GMT -5
He made his hypothesis anyway: according to Danny, links – or the way Google counts links in the form of votes – remain the most important signal, while in second place are “words”, understood in the broadest possible sense: from the words on the page, to how Google interprets the words that users write in the engine's search form. The first two factors are Content and Links (NOT in that order!) On March 23, 2016, during a live streaming Q&A organized by WebPromo.Expert, Andrey Lipattsev (Search Quality Senior Strategist at Google) confirmed Sullivan's hypothesis: I can tell you what they are.
It's the contents. And the links that point to your site. When asked what the exact order Malaysia Phone Number List of these 2 factors was, Lipattsev replied that "there is no order": therefore it is not possible to know whether the contents or the links are more important in the eyes of Google. …and RankBrain may NOT be the third factor The point is that RankBrain does not have the same impact on all queries. According to what a Google spokesperson told The SEM Post, “it is particularly helpful on long-tail queries, such as the 15% of new queries that are made every day.” Therefore RankBrain could actually be the 3rd factor on a certain area of searches, but not on much more competitive and "seasoned" queries.
Q&A, said that “the question of third place is highly controversial. Take this “with a grain of salt”. Conclusion In my humble opinion, saying that the 3 most important ranking signals on Google are content, links and RankBrain is equivalent to saying nothing really useful. Too little is still known about RankBrain, while contents and links are excessively broad areas: in the absence of more precise, qualitative and quantitative indications, knowing that these 2 factors are the most important certainly does not change the life of those who deal with SEO. Also because I don't think there is anyone who does SEO without putting content and links at the center... or am I wrong?🙂 Previous PREVIOUS If your Content is NOT Useful
It's the contents. And the links that point to your site. When asked what the exact order Malaysia Phone Number List of these 2 factors was, Lipattsev replied that "there is no order": therefore it is not possible to know whether the contents or the links are more important in the eyes of Google. …and RankBrain may NOT be the third factor The point is that RankBrain does not have the same impact on all queries. According to what a Google spokesperson told The SEM Post, “it is particularly helpful on long-tail queries, such as the 15% of new queries that are made every day.” Therefore RankBrain could actually be the 3rd factor on a certain area of searches, but not on much more competitive and "seasoned" queries.
Q&A, said that “the question of third place is highly controversial. Take this “with a grain of salt”. Conclusion In my humble opinion, saying that the 3 most important ranking signals on Google are content, links and RankBrain is equivalent to saying nothing really useful. Too little is still known about RankBrain, while contents and links are excessively broad areas: in the absence of more precise, qualitative and quantitative indications, knowing that these 2 factors are the most important certainly does not change the life of those who deal with SEO. Also because I don't think there is anyone who does SEO without putting content and links at the center... or am I wrong?🙂 Previous PREVIOUS If your Content is NOT Useful